Business

Unit 4 Assignment 1
Submit Assignment

Due Feb 2 by 11:59pm
Points 75
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
Instructions
Big Rig Manufacturing has recently gone through an organizational change and decided that while they had been leveraging teams within their project approach, that they had not been doing it to the full extent they would like. Some of their teams completely missed their goals and even started fighting prior to meeting the project goals. They also saw several projects fail due to lack of team involvement and stakeholder buy-in.

Big Rig has asked you for your help in determining how they can better form project teams in their organization to achieve their organizational goals.

Using the five stages for team formation, create a plan for how they could leverage this approach to improve their team performance, objective, goal measurement and attainment, and improve speed to completion in projects.
Estimated time to complete: 8 hours

Rubric
BU329 Unit 4 Assignment 1

BU329 Unit 4 Assignment 1

CRITERIA RATINGS PTS
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

7.5 pts
Level 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.

6.75 pts
Level 4

Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.

6.0 pts
Level 3

Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.

5.25 pts
Level 2

Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.

4.5 pts
Level 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.

0.0 pts
Level 0

Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

7.5 pts
Level 5

Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).

6.75 pts
Level 4

Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

6.0 pts
Level 3

Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

5.25 pts
Level 2

Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(s) are identified.

4.5 pts
Level 1

Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches

0.0 pts
Level 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentBU329-CO3

18.5 pts
Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

16.65 pts
Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed

14.8 pts
Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

12.95 pts
Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

11.1 pts
Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts
Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

18.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-I

18.5 pts
Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16.65 pts
Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14.8 pts
Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

12.95 pts
Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

11.1 pts
Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts
Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

18.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

7.5 pts
Level 5

Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.

6.75 pts
Level 4

Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.

6.0 pts
Level 3

Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.

5.25 pts
Level 2

Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

4.5 pts
Level 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.

0.0 pts
Level 0

States an illogical conclusion from findings.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

7.5 pts
Level 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6.75 pts
Level 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6.0 pts
Level 3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

5.25 pts
Level 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

4.5 pts
Level 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0.0 pts
Level 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

4.0 pts
Level 5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

3.6 pts
Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

3.2 pts
Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

2.8 pts
Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

2.4 pts
Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts
Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

4.0 pts
Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

3.6 pts
Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.2 pts
Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

2.8 pts
Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

2.4 pts
Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts
Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

4.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation Guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: