Explain specific ELL strategies used in relation to a recognized instructional theory

I don’t understand Part B number 4, “Explain specific ELL strategies used in relation to a recognized instructional theory” For Part B, what ELL strategies did you use during the lesson that are in line with ELL theories?

Explain specific ELL strategies used in relation to a recognized instructional theory
Part A The Documentation Form for Task 2 is confusing
Here is a complete rundown. Please contact a course mentor if you need help with this:
● For all of your 30 field experience teaching hours, you need to use the Field Experience Log. Just the one form will do. It’s best to keep it on the computer and type into it, because it will get very long, and you will need to submit it when you are done. Use the version in Assessments, under the Task 2 directions.

● You need to log all 30 hours on this form and you need to give ELL/ELD (etc) Standards for each lesson.

● In addition, you will need to choose any 5 of these same teaching hours to also write a separate analysis for. For that part you will type it out, narrative style, in a separate document, not using a form. Please read the directions (Task Requirement) in Assessments for Parts B and C before you begin your field experience to make sure you will have everything you need for this!

Parts B & C
For Parts B and C of this task, you need to choose any 5 of the lessons you taught to write a brief analysis that goes beyond the Documentation Form. Read ahead to make sure you know what needs to be included in these 5 lessons. Keep in mind that the requirements from Part B need to be included in your analysis for all 5 lessons, while the requirements for Part C just need to be represented at least once somewhere in those 5 lessons as a group (so these things don’t need to happen in all 5 lessons).

I don’t understand Part B number 4, “Explain specific ELL strategies used in relation to a recognized instructional theory”
For Part B, what ELL strategies did you use during the lesson that are in line with ELL theories? Did you use any TPR, from James Asher, or do anything to lower the students’ affective filter from Krashen’s Monitor Model, or did you link concepts to students’ background per the SIOP model, etc.? You may also have used increased wait time, gestures, etc., as strategies to aid student comprehension.

I don’t understand section C?
Ideally, you will read ahead and be planning for this requirement as you write part B. Make sure these elements are included in the lessons you chose to analyze. Here is a more specific breakdown:

C.1. Refers to an assessment that you create yourself for your ELL students, it can be either formative or summative.

C.2. Refers to an assessment that may or may not have been created for ELL students (such as an assessment that came with the textbook you are using)

Describe the adaptations you made for your ELL students. Such as writing a “glossary” of possibly unknown words used in the directions. Further, putting it up on the board or printing it out for those students. Or perhaps just giving them more time on the test.

C.3. Refers to resources/materials you selected to use in the lesson that were intended specifically to support/help ELL students with English and content

(did you show pictures to aid comprehension of content vocabulary?)

C.4. Refers to resources/materials you developed, or created, for the same purposes as C.3.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation Guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: