integrated strategic plan

Strategic Planning: Develop an integrated strategic plan to address a challenge or opportunity faced by a healthcare organization.

Assessment Rubric

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

3 Exceeds Expectations

Part I: Detailed Report for Western Hospital’s Board of Directors and CEO

Sub-Competency 1: Develop an executive summary.

Learning Objective LO 1.1: Create alignment between the goals of the community center and the goals of the PPACA, HP2020 and IOM.

Explanation of how the goals of the Center for Diabetes Care align with the goals of the PPACA Community Health Center Fund, Healthy People 2020, and IOM aims for quality care is missing.

Executive summary is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete in explaining how the goals of the Center for Diabetes Care align with the goals of the PPACA Community Health Center Fund, Healthy People 2020, and IOM aims for quality care. Response does not reference academic/professional resources or the resources are not relevant.

Executive summary clearly and accurately explains how the goals of the Center for Diabetes Care align with the goals of the PPACA Community Health Center Fund, Healthy People 2020, and IOM aims for quality care. Response references relevant academic/professional resources.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Response explains one or more major trends in the healthcare industry driven by the PPACA. Response articulates how the Center for Diabetes Care aligns with the trend in the healthcare industry.

Learning Objective LO 1.2: Explanation of stakeholder perspectives that support business recommendations.

Summary of stakeholder perspectives in order to make business recommendations is missing.

Executive summary is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete in explaining internal and external stakeholder perspectives that support the business recommendation presented in the case.

Executive summary clearly explains internal and external stakeholder perspectives that support the business recommendation presented in the case.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Perspectives presented make a compelling argument for the business recommendation.

©2015 Walden University 2

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

3 Exceeds Expectations

Learning Objective 1.3: Explain how the business recommendation fits within the continuum of care.

Explanation of how the business recommendation fits within the continuum of care is missing.

Executive summary is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete in explaining how the recommendation presented in the case fits within the continuum of care of the healthcare organization presented in the case.

Executive summary clearly and accurately explains how the recommendation presented in the case fits within the continuum of care of the healthcare organization presented in the case.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Explanation quantifies the benefits that the business recommendation provides within the continuum of care.

Sub-Competency 2: Create a strategic plan.

Learning Objective 2.1: Create vision and mission statements.

Creation of vision and mission statements is missing.

Vision and mission statements are vague or not concise. Vision and mission statements do not align with the needs and goals of the healthcare organization in the case presented.

Vision and mission statements are clear and concise. Vision and mission statements clearly align with the needs and goals of the healthcare organization in the case presented.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Vision and mission statements reflect accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.

Learning Objective 2.2: Create a value statement.

Creation of a value statement is missing.

Value statement does not align with the mission statement. Value statement is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.

Value statement clearly aligns with the mission and vision statements.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Value statement aligns with accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.

Learning Objective 2.3: SWOT analysis is missing. SWOT analysis does not SWOT analysis clearly and Response demonstrates

©2015 Walden University 3

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

3 Exceeds Expectations

Conduct a SWOT analysis.

include at least four of the greatest strengths, four of the greatest weaknesses, four of the greatest opportunities, and four of the greatest threats for the development of the initiative recommended in the case presented. Content of the SWOT analysis is vague, inaccurate, or not concise. Analysis does not take into consideration the information and perspectives from all documentation provided with the case.

concisely identifies four of the greatest strengths, four of the greatest weaknesses, four of the greatest opportunities, and four of the greatest threats for the development of the initiative recommended in the case presented. Analysis takes into consideration the information and perspectives from all documentation provided with the case.

the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Analysis clearly and concisely identifies six of the greatest strengths, six of the greatest weaknesses, six of the greatest opportunities, and six of the greatest threats for the development of the initiative recommended in the case presented.

Learning Objective 2.4: Develop strategies for launching and operationalizing a healthcare initiative.

Development of strategies for launching and operationalizing a healthcare initiative is missing.

Response describes fewer than four strategies for launching and operationalizing the initiative recommended in the case presented. Strategies do not align with the SWOT analysis.

Response clearly and concisely describes at least four strategies for launching and operationalizing the initiative recommended in the case presented. Strategies align with the results of the SWOT analysis.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Response clearly and concisely describes five or more strategies for launching and operationalizing the initiative recommended in the case presented.

©2015 Walden University 4

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

3 Exceeds Expectations

Response includes rationale for strategies supported by qualitative and quantitative data from case materials, and an explanation of the potential impact of the strategies.

Learning Objective 2.5: Develop goals for a healthcare initiative.

Description of measurable short-term and long-term goals is missing.

Response describes fewer than four short-term goals and/or fewer than four measurable long-term goals for the initiative recommended in the case presented, and/or the goals are not measurable, and/or they do not align with the mission, vision, and values statements.

Response describes four measurable short-term goals and four measurable long-term goals for the initiative recommended in the case presented. Goals align with the mission, vision, and values statements.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Goals are presented using a balanced scorecard.

Sub-Competency 3: Create a business plan.

Learning Objective 3.1: Develop a timeline for implementing key activities.

Development of a timeline for implementing key activities is missing.

Timeline provides fewer than 10 milestones. Timeline is not realistic or not achievable.

Timeline provides at least 10 milestones. Timeline is realistic and achievable.

Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Timeline identifies responsible parties for each item.

Learning Objective 3.2: Analyze financial data.

Analysis of financial data is missing.

Analysis of the expected patient-generated

Response provides a clear and concise analysis of the

Response demonstrates the same level of

©2015 Walden University 5

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

3 Exceeds Expectations

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our Guarantees

Money-back Guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism Guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision Policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy Policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation Guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: