Submission FeedbackFunmi, thanks for this submission. Unfortunately, most of the issues identified by Dr. Mast during the first evaluation remain. Because you did not re-submit your PowerPoint presentation, I was unable to reassess those areas of the submission – for your next submission, please make sure your submit your corrected presentation. The major issue in your assessment is your incorrect financial analysis – you portray a profitable, going concern in your analysis, when the data reflects something very different. I encourage you to think through your analysis very carefully and review the financial data submitted with the case; use this data and only this data in performing your analysis. I have also pointed out numerous writing issues in your paper – please address all of these for your next submission. The next submission will be your third and final attempt at this competency. Take your time and review and address all my feedback before resubmission. If you have questions regarding any of my feedback – please do not hesitate to contact me for clarification. I would be happy to schedule a call with you if that would help. Because this is your final attempt, I would like to review a draft of your assessment as your SME, before you re-submit to make sure everything has been addressed. Thanks, Dr. SteveLearning Objective LO 1.1: Create alignment between the goals of the community center and the goals of the PPACA, HP2020 and IOM.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2 Executive summary clearly and accurately explains how the goals of the Center for Diabetes Care align with the goals of the PPACA Community Health Center Fund, Healthy People 2020, and IOM aims for quality care. Response references relevant academic/professional resources.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective LO 1.2: Explanation ofstakeholder perspectives that support business recommendations.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2 Executive summary clearly explains internal and external stakeholder perspectives that support the business recommendation presented in the case.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective1.3: Explain how the business recommendation fits within the continuum of care.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2 Executive summary clearly and accurately explains how the recommendation presented in the case fits within the continuum of care of the healthcare organization presented in the case.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective 2.1: Create vision and mission statements.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3 Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Vision and mission statements reflect accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective 2.2: Create a value statement.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3 Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Value statement aligns with accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective 2.3: Conduct a SWOT analysis.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1 SWOT analysis does not include at least four of the greatest strengths, four of the greatest weaknesses, four of the greatest opportunities, and four of the greatest threats for the development of the initiative recommended in the case presented. Content of the SWOT analysis is vague, inaccurate, or not concise. Analysis does not take into consideration the information and perspectives from all documentation provided with the case.
Additional Comments:
Your analysis does not include include at least four of the greatest weaknesses of the initiative recommended in the case presented.

Additionally, your analysis does not take into consideration all the information and perspectives from all documentation provided with the case. Specifically, you have not discussed the impact funding will have on the sustainability of this venture.

Learning Objective 2.4: Develop strategies for launching and operationalizing a healthcare initiative.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2 Response clearly and concisely describes at least four strategies for launching and operationalizing the initiative recommended in the case presented. Strategies align with the results of the SWOT analysis.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective 2.5: Develop goals for a healthcare initiative.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1 Response describes fewer than four short-term goals and/or fewer than four measurable long-term goals for the initiative recommended in the case presented, and/or the goals are not measurable, and/or they do not align with the mission, vision, and values statements.
Additional Comments:Your response describes fewer than four measurable long-term goals for the initiative recommended in the case presented, and some the goals are not measurable; at least it is not clear how they would be measured. Please expand your response by adding at least two long range goals and make clear how each goal will be measured.
Learning Objective3.1: Develop a timeline for implementing key activities.:

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
3 Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following: Timeline identifies responsible parties for each item.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective 3.2: Analyze financial data.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1 Analysis of the expected patient-generated revenue, grant funding, non-staff costs, staffing costs, and capital costs for the initiative presented in the case. Chart summarizing the financial data is confusing, vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.
Additional Comments:
Your analysis of the expected patient-generated

revenue, grant funding, non-staff costs, staffing costs, and capital costs for the initiative presented in the case is incorrect. It appears you have not used the correct data for your analysis.

The chart summarizing the financial data are confusing and inaccurate. Please re-accomplish this part of your assessment using the correct data.

Learning Objective 4.1: Defend how the recommended healthcare initiative addresses unmet needs.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1 Defense of the recommended initiative does not address unmet needs, or the defense is weak or vague, or is not relevant to the initiative in the case presented. Explanation does not reference relevant information provided in the needs-assessment documentation presented in the case.
Additional Comments: Funmi, because you did not re-submit your presentation as required, I was unable to evaluate this objective, so the score remains from your initial submission. Please address the issues identified by myself and Dr. Mast on your first two attempts and re-submit your presentation for evaluation on your third attempt.
Learning Objective 4.2: Explain how a healthcare initiative can help promote positive social change.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2 The presentation clearly explains three ways in which the initiative recommended in the case presented can help promote positive social change. The presentation explains the connections between the positive health outcomes related to the case, and positive social change.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective 4.3: Create a culturally competent healthcare initiative.:

MEETS EXPECTATIONS
2 The presentation provides a clear explanation of how the healthcare initiative in the case presented would be structured to ensure cultural competency with the patient population. Explanation considers human resources, programs, community outreach, and involvement with internal and external stakeholders.
Additional Comments:
Learning Objective 4.4: Explain how a healthcare initiative can become financially self-sustaining.:

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
1 Explanation of how the healthcare initiative in the case presented can become financially self-sustaining within three years of opening is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.
Additional Comments:Funmi, because you did not re-submit your presentation as required, I was unable to evaluate this objective, so the score remains from your initial submission. Please address the issues identified by myself and Dr. Mast on your first two attempts and re-submit your presentation for evaluation on your third attempt.